by Karen Boss.

Baseball season and dating season begin at the same time. Most people (especially those of us who have suffered a long winter) find that when spring begins its slow crawl - and our favorite team starts winning, we are ready to begin anew our search for a perfect mate for the long summer days and even longer summer nights.
Dating (and baseball) season has only been open since April, and already I’m losing steam. I am no Dice-K, that’s for damn sure.
The Red Sox may be still leading the American League (and 8 over the Yankees I might add smugly), but I’m certainly not up in the dating standings in the third month of the season.
|
First loss: A man who right before our third date told me he wasn’t looking for a relationship but wanted to keep hanging out. Spending time one-on-one with someone my age, who is a man and attractive and calling it friendship is not on my list. Fake-dating sucks, no matter how you cut it. So I bailed. |
| Second loss: A guy who spent 3 hours buying me beers and having a great conversation. I saw him at two work events, one where he fetched me a beer and asked for my opinion on a gift for his mom and one where he mostly ignored me but then sought me out to say bye and threw in a “Hey, baby, I’m leaving” for, I don’t know, good measure? | |
|
Third loss: The guy I had offered a ride home to after our second date. Note to all the male readers out there: when a woman offers you a ride home, and you arrive there, you have two choices. One, invite her up. Two, get out. There is not a sit-in-the-car-and-chat choice. |
| Fourth loss: The fight over IM. I kid you not. He mentioned that he’d rather be lucky than smart. I said that I thought luck was a result of hard work with potentially some privilege thrown in. He asked my definition of privilege; I defined it as having resources, support, and things such as race and gender assignment by accident of birth and/or parentage. He asked why I use “gender” instead of “sex” and I said because I think “gender” is more inclusive, allowing for a continuum rather than simply “male” or “female”. He said, and I quote, “deconstructive masking by disguise. egregious pc-ism makes one’s teeth itch, or should.” The final result: he said that none of his success is due to his being white or male and that anyone who believes that is Marxist. So there you go with that one. | |
|
Fifth loss: Phone call with one guy who seemed sweet. But he asked twice over email if I had put him under speed dial. Chill, dude. The fact that you are even in my phone is more a result of technology-driven laziness than of anything else. |
And finally the sixth: I went on a same-day date (which every rule book of dating says you shouldn’t do) with guy and had a fine conversation. But, I drove through a lot of stop signs (you know, red flags on dates you know you should listen to and don’t). First stop sign: he sat there, making no move to go to the bar to get us beers, and let me get them. Stop sign 2: When I was up at the bar, he yelled over, “Will you get me loaded fries, too?” Stop sign 3: He was wearing dark pants, white socks and black shoes and anyone could clearly see his pants were far too short (last I checked men are able to buy their pants by the number of inches of length they need).

